Now Reading
From London to Newyork in half an hour? Is it possible?

From London to Newyork in half an hour? Is it possible?

Travellers who dream of flying at quicker compared to the rate of sound could shortly possess the chance. Strategies to recommence Concorde flights by 2019 are in place and today a Canadian designer has released his theory layout for Skreemr, an aircraft that uses nascent technology to reach speeds over Mach 10. That is the equivalent of 7,673 miles per hour (or 12,345 kilometres per hour) and about five times quicker than Concorde. It could take about 30 minutes to fly between London and New York if going at this rate.

For Charles Bombardier, Skreemr’s Canadian creator, the essential element that will enable the aircraft to reach these rates could be a magnetic railgun launching system. The airplane would initially “take off” by hurtling along a railway-like path horizontally rather than rising upwards and then rockets would raise the aircraft rate enough to ignite its scramjet engine, enabling it to reach this kind of extreme rate after which rise upwards.

Scramjet engines, or “supersonic combustion ramjets”, are being developed in the United States and China and, NASA describes, were created to draw the oxygen needed by an engine to combust in the atmosphere passing through the vehicle instead of from a tank onboard. Consequently the aircraft is smaller, lighter and quicker.

Bombardier’s aircraft would take 75 passengers and its own rockets and scramjets would burn hydrogen made with hydroelectricity. The designer described his strategies in more detail to Canada’s Globe and Mail. One hurdle the aircraft would face, nevertheless, is the way it can resist higher temperatures.

An aircraft going at Mach 5 could reach temperatures of 980C so sourcing affordable stuff which could withstand that level will be debatable. Though Skreemr stays a theory at this period numerous other progressive firms are making major improvement within their strategies to start supersonic flights.

What's Your Reaction?
Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0
Scroll To Top